報告佐民學長,老獨裁者蔣介石,可見下面這一段:
CHIANG KAI-SHEK may once have been revered as a near-god on Taiwan, where he led his Chinese Nationalist regime after being defeated by Mao Zedong's Communists on the mainland in 1949. But almost a third of a century after his death, the memory of the old dictator is being effaced, with the removal of the generalissimo's statues and the renaming of many streets and even Taipei's international airport.
至於學長所提:
為什麼由一小撮人便決定取捨台灣文化？
而最不理解的是即已執政多年，為什麼早不做晚不做？選舉要到了才做？！非要撕裂了台灣才高興？
我很贊同,事實上學長也點出民進黨人的動機所在:一切基於選舉考量.換個角度講,就是他們判斷這一招仍然有效,而且又不費力(要擘畫十年或二十年後國家發展的藍圖,很累人耶),所以才會用.是否真的有用,我不知道,就由台灣公民決定吧.
我開此一主題,主要還在於點出,台灣媒體有失嚴謹,因此看到引述外國媒體之處,總希望能找到原文比對一下.希望會員看過該篇短文後,能針對我的解讀,特別是對cultural revolution的中譯部分,提出看法. |
樓主
